Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:31:54 -0500
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:12:10 EST, Larry Seltzer said:
Yeah, fine, so if this bothers you use a VPN. I still it's something very few people need to worry about.
More correctly, the vast majority of sites are so screwed security-wise that they'll never have the opportunity to see a MITM attack against Terminal Server, as they're going to get 0wned via much easier attacks.....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: [lists] Terminal Server vulnerabilities, (continued)
- RE: [lists] Terminal Server vulnerabilities ALD, Aditya, Aditya Lalit Deshmukh (Jan 27)
- Re: [lists] Terminal Server vulnerabilities Jan Muenther (Jan 27)
- Re: [lists] Terminal Server vulnerabilities Jonathan Rickman (Jan 26)
- Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities Nicolas RUFF (lists) (Jan 27)
- Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 27)
- Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities Daniel H. Renner (Jan 24)
- RE: Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities Larry Seltzer (Jan 25)
- Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities offtopic (Jan 25)
- RE: Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities Mark Senior (Jan 25)
- RE: Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities Larry Seltzer (Jan 25)
- Re: Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 25)
- RE: Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities Larry Seltzer (Jan 25)
- Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities larry_seltzer_is_a_fraud (Jan 26)
- RE: Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities Bob the Builder (Jan 26)
- RE: Terminal Server vulnerabilities Stuart Fox (DSL AK) (Jan 27)