Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: list noise
From: Steve Kudlak <stevex11 () sbcglobal net>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 03:12:02 -0800
In my case I get a mix of stuff that comes a variety of places. The various sbc clones were in there, so was symoatico. There were Healtyh Insurance processors and they seemed the worst. I think it varies depending on a lot of variables. But it is worth watching this stuff and taking adequate precautions. I have Norton and am considering a backup. My other account is run through sentinare which is really good that plus Norton gets almost everything. The only one that got through yearsn ago was the A"Playa Virus" but luckily I don't use IE or Outlook and I just tossed it withoug opening the attachment so all was OK.
Have Fun, Sends Steve P,S, I also scan all outgoing mail etc. dcdave () att net wrote:
Steve,On a related topic, what is sbcglobal? 90% of the virus e-mail I see coming in where I work (usually Jennifer the wild girl xxx07) is coming from infected sbcglobal addresses. Warm regards,dcdave-- CSO InfoSec Group 703-626-6516 -------------- Original message from Steve Kudlak <stevex11 () sbcglobal net>: -------------- > dcdave () att net wrote: > > >I will NOT respond to this; > >I will NOT respond to this; > >I will Not respond to this; > > > >dcdave > > > >-- > >CSO > >InfoSec Group > >703-626-6516 > > > > > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > >From: phased > > > > > >>I also care about noise, and responding to stupid mails makes it worse. > >>Every time people send stupid mails like the rm file thing, and people reply > to > >>the list, the author was successful in filling the list with crap for a day or > >>so. > >> > >>If no one replies, then they dont get attention and the people who know their > >>advisories(anyone with common sense) are blatantly crap will not be affected > by > >>their nuisance. > >> > >>You always get a load of emails to the list from people who want to tell > >>everyone they know that an advisory for example was crap, yes we know > >>thank you, but we are not handing out gold stars today!!! > >>No need to tell us all every time!!! > >> > >>phased > >> > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Barrie Dempster > >>To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com > >>Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 09:36:07 +0000 > >>Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Multiple Backdoors found in eEye > Products(IRISand > >>SecureIIS) > >> > >> > >> > >>>I'd hav! e to agr ee with the eEye statement on this one. You sent out an > >>>advisory without disclosing the details, which offers no real benefit to > >>>anyone. Many people consider this responsible disclosure but that also > >>>requires you to notify the vendor (there were no @eeye.com's in your > >>>"to" list but there were a couple of press mailboxes). > >>> > >>>You didn't contact eEye, you didn't release details, you used an > >>>anonymous address and failed to mention or credit any of the other guys > >>>in your "testing team", This can only lead us to believe that the > >>>advisory is fake and only intended to generate bad press for eEye. I > >>>personally don't care about eEye's PR rating but I do care about the > >>>level of noise on these lists and I do care about backdoor-ed commercial > >>>products that are in common use. You may have an issue with eEye and see > >>>this as revenge. However, I doubt you also have an issue with the many > >>>admins who probably have spent their holiday season investigating these > >>>claims, when there are likely more pressing matters to address, such as > >>>a large stock of alcohol. > >>> > >>>Show us details, or be quiet. If you intended to embarrass eEye the plan > >>>backfired as any competent professional on this list (there are a few - > >>>I've heard stories about them) would see this as a shameful attempt and > >>>would be laughing at you, not eEye. > >>> > >>>Seasons greetings to eEye and all Full Disclosure subscribers - even you > >>>"Lance Gusto". > >>> > >>>With Regards.. > >>>Barrie Dempster (zeedo) - Fortiter et Strenue > >&! gt;> > >>> http://www.bsrf.org.uk > >>> > >>>[ gpg --recv-keys --keyserver www.keyserver.net 0x96025FD0 ] > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>ATTACHMENT: application/pgp-signature ("signature.asc") > >>> > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > >>>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > >>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > >> > >> > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > >Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > > > > > > > Neither Will I! > Neither Will I! > Neither Will I! > Let it Die! > Let it Die! > Let it Die!;) > > Have Fun, > Sends Steve>
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: list noise dcdave (Jan 02)
- Re: list noise Steve Kudlak (Jan 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- list noise phased (Jan 04)
- Re: list noise Steve Kudlak (Jan 06)