SOX whistleblower requirements challenged in court? (Was SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance)

["Jesse W. Asher" <jasher1 () tampabay rr com>]

I was curious about the mention of "the SOX whistleblowers requirements 
have been challenged in court".  Can anyone provide more information on 
this?  What has challenged and why?  Thanks!!

> > From: Madison, Marc [mailto:mmadison () fnni com] 
> > IANAL, But IMO use an Intranet web page that allows employees 
> > to submit
> > anonymous html post to the web server via html.  Now if your security
> > policy is pervasive then surely auditing is enabled on all 
> > your systems,
> > thus removing any anonymity this would have provided.  Have you
> > considered, dare I say, outsourcing?  I only say this since 
> > part of the
> > requirement calls for the company to provide sufficient anonymity to
> > individuals reporting issues.  By the way the SOX whistleblowers
> > requirements have already been challenged in court so there might be
> > precedence on what is sufficient.
> >    
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/