Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: a call for full-disclosure to become a moderated list
From: InfoSecBOFH <infosecbofh () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 07:38:59 -0800
Wow, we have another n3td3v here. Editing your emails? Sorry, not guilty. Replying to you on list so everyone can see you continue to stir the pot, guilty. My momma did not teach my any manners but I taught your momma that thing she does with her tongue. On 12/14/05, mis () seiden com <mis () seiden com> wrote:
didn't your mamma teach you any manners? call me whatever you want, i will not reply to you on the list. taking private email and posting it on a list is not polite. editing it to remove context is even less polite. On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:58:41PM -0800, InfoSecBOFH wrote:Hey cry baby, the only reason this list exists and has half the subscribers it has is because of the lack of moderation. If this list was moderated it would be nothing more than Bugtraq On 12/14/05, mis () seiden com <mis () seiden com> wrote:it seems to me that without a moderator (since there is the apparent absence of people who are moderate, or even civilized), this list will continue its degeneration into a never-ending pissing contest. (some people don't seem to think that the social compact one accepts when joining a list applies to them. my most recent attempt to politely, in direct email, ask one of the offenders to stop doing this sort of thing on the list ... was posted with a twerpy reply right back to the list). (no good deed goes unpunished). how many people who actually find value in this list (which i have, since len rose set it up quite a long time ago) agree with this position? if you think there's a compelling reason for no moderation, i'd like to hear it. i call to your attention three brief selections from the list charter, which is at http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html which i think have been violated recently: "Members are expected to maintain a reasonable standard of netiquette when posting to the list." "Disagreements, flames, arguments, and off-topic discussion should be taken off-list wherever possible." "Gratuitous advertisement, product placement, or self-promotion is forbidden." _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- a call for full-disclosure to become a moderated list mis (Dec 14)
- OT: a call for full-disclosure to become a moderatedlist Kurt Seifried (Dec 14)
- Re: a call for full-disclosure to become a moderated list InfoSecBOFH (Dec 14)
- Re: a call for full-disclosure to become a moderated list name pipe (Dec 15)
- Message not available
- Re: a call for full-disclosure to become a moderated list InfoSecBOFH (Dec 15)
- Re: a call for full-disclosure to become a moderated list Christoph Gruber (Dec 15)
- Re: a call for full-disclosure to become a moderated list Troy (Dec 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME A MODERATED LIST uber (Dec 15)
- Re: A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME A MODERATED LIST Rembrandt (Dec 15)
- Re: A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME A MODERATED LIST Joe Average (Dec 15)
- Re: A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME A MODERATED LIST Rembrandt (Dec 15)
- Re: A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME A MODERATED LIST Steve Russell (Dec 16)
- Re: A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME AMODERATED LIST Exibar (Dec 16)
- Re: A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME AMODERATED LIST crazy frog crazy frog (Dec 17)
- Re: A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME AMODERATED LIST Joe Average (Dec 17)