Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: New paper on Security and Obscurity
From: stephane nasdrovisky <stephane.nasdrovisky () paradigmo com>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 15:25:46 +0200
This not so new info may bring some lights : http://www.fact-index.com/a/au/auguste_kerckhoffs.html : "... the security of a cryptosystem must depend only on the key, not on the secrecy of any other part of the system."
Peter Swire wrote:
“full disclosure” and computer security: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=531782 The paper begins by analyzing the cliché that “there is no security through obscurity.” It observes that the traditional military and intelligence cliché is that “loose lips sink ships.”
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- New paper on Security and Obscurity Peter Swire (Aug 31)
- Re: New paper on Security and Obscurity gadgeteer (Sep 01)
- Re: New paper on Security and Obscurity Dave Aitel (Sep 01)
- Re: New paper on Security and Obscurity gadgeteer (Sep 01)
- Re: New paper on Security and Obscurity stephane nasdrovisky (Sep 01)
- Re: New paper on Security and Obscurity stephane nasdrovisky (Sep 01)
- Re: New paper on Security and Obscurity Barry Fitzgerald (Sep 01)
- RE: Response to comments on Security and Obscurity Peter Swire (Sep 01)
- RE: Response to comments on Security and Obscurity Dave Aitel (Sep 01)
- Security & Obscurity: First-time attacks and lawyer jokes Peter Swire (Sep 02)
- Re: Security & Obscurity: First-time attacks and lawyer jokes Georgi Guninski (Sep 02)
- Re: Security & Obscurity: First-time attacks and lawyer jokes Honza Vlach (Sep 03)
- Re: Security & Obscurity: First-time attacks and lawyer jokes Dave Aitel (Sep 02)
- Re: Security & Obscurity: First-time attacks and lawyer jokes Mr. Rufus Faloofus (Sep 02)
- RE: Response to comments on Security and Obscurity Peter Swire (Sep 01)
- Re[2]: Response to comments on Security and Obscurity 3APA3A (Sep 01)
- Re: Re[2]: Response to comments on Security and Obscurity James Tucker (Sep 01)