Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Why is IRC still around?
From: Darren Reed <avalon () cairo anu edu au>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:14:49 +1100 (EST)
This has got to be close to the most stupid thread ever on full-disclosure. I'm not sure if it gets that because the original email was so incredibly naieve or just narrow minded or just a result of very shallow thinking. It's almost dumb enough that you could suggest its premise to some American Senator, that's in bed with the RIAA/MPAA, as a way of stopping those who traffic copyrighted material from communicating and tomorrow you'd see a bill before congree outlawing IRC. The only way IRC will ever "go away" is when something better comes along and even then, maybe not. There are countless IRC chat networks, aside from the "big X" and a lot of people are quite happy and content with the status quo and nothing anyone says or does is going to make them change. The person who brought it up should be forced to clean toilets at McDonalds for a year or something equally disgusting. Darren _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Why is IRC still around?, (continued)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Danny (Nov 19)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Harry Hoffman (Nov 20)
- RE: Why is IRC still around? Bowes, Ronald (EST) (Nov 19)
- RE: Why is IRC still around? Keith Pachulski (Nov 20)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Danny (Nov 20)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Danny (Nov 20)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Darren Reed (Nov 21)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? ntx0f (Nov 20)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? n3td3v (Nov 20)