Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Why is IRC still around? (Because anything less would be uncivilized)
From: Danny <nocmonkey () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 18:46:30 -0500
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 22:48:46 +0000, Andrew Smith <stfunub () gmail com> wrote:
Well, fellow F-D'ers, thanks to the vast array of intelligence and experience found on this list, my rant about abolishing IRC has been proven to be far from a solution.I..can't tell if it's sarcasm or not, damn those trolls and their mind poisoning ways.
I am serious. That concludes this topic. ...D _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Why is IRC still around?, (continued)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Danny (Nov 23)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? nicolas vigier (Nov 24)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Danny (Nov 23)
- RE: Why is IRC still around? Bowes, Ronald (EST) (Nov 19)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Danny (Nov 19)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Harry Hoffman (Nov 20)
- RE: Why is IRC still around? Bowes, Ronald (EST) (Nov 19)
- RE: Why is IRC still around? Keith Pachulski (Nov 20)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Danny (Nov 20)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? (Because anything less would be uncivilized) Danny (Nov 19)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? (Because anything less would be uncivilized) Andrew Smith (Nov 20)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? (Because anything less would be uncivilized) Danny (Nov 20)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Danny (Nov 20)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Danny (Nov 20)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Darren Reed (Nov 21)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? ntx0f (Nov 20)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? n3td3v (Nov 20)