Re: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

[Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>]

* Paul Schmehl:

> --On Monday, November 15, 2004 07:25:58 PM +0100 Florian Weimer 
> <fw () deneb enyo de> wrote:
> > > <http://www.sbe.state.va.us/Election/Electoral_College.htm>
> > > <http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_elec.html>
> > > <http://www.spies.com/Forums/showthread.php?threadid=404>
> >
> > And what's your point?
>
> If you want to understand how the electoral system works, read.  Just 
> because you don't understand it doesn't mean it doesn't make sense.

At least one of these documents is factually incorrect.  I fail to see
how procedural details can shed some light on the current strange
effects you are experiencing.

Or do you think that if electors were assigned according to
Hare-Niemeyer, the vote tallying problems would multiply?  The Law of
Large Numbers suggests it's far less likely that they could have
actual election-deciding effect.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html