Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Moox firefox/thunderbird builds. Anyone looked at these yet?
From: dk <dk () pwarchitects com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:50:23 -0600
Eric Paynter wrote:
Well a cursory look at the forums suggest that there is indeed a performance gain, and a bit of a following to these builds as well. I gather then that it's a stability issue (etc) with the Official Mozilla team not using his compiler flags, etc for optimization, which makes complete sense in a number of area's (QA for one). There is also suggestions by other posts [1] that he takes patches not integrated into the "official builds", so I gather that he's adding to the code himself in places. All of which is fine and dandy by me; the guy looks respectful of Mozilla trademarks, (etc) and rather helpful in providing this resource. But as I couldn't find the source he compiles from, (post patches) or work he's done /other/ than binary files -- it just smelled a bit funny.I wonder why somebody would branch just to do performance improvements? Why not just work with the mozilla team and apply the changes to thesource tree?
Or maybe I'm just a super paranoid security professional.
Nothing wrong with that now is there? :) [1] http://www.moox.ws/forum/viewtopic.php?t=29 -- dk _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Moox firefox/thunderbird builds. Anyone looked at these yet? dk (Nov 10)
- Re: Moox firefox/thunderbird builds. Anyone looked at these yet? Eric Paynter (Nov 10)
- Re: Moox firefox/thunderbird builds. Anyone looked at these yet? dk (Nov 10)
- Re: Moox firefox/thunderbird builds. Anyone looked at these yet? Eric Paynter (Nov 10)