Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 10:27:01 -0400
On Wed, 26 May 2004 14:36:13 PDT, Benjamin Krueger said:
A confidential, copyrighted, and incriminating document is leaked out of a major institution and in to the hands of a journalism organization. The document is intensely scrutinized by that organization and a few experts they bring in. They break the story to the public along with the document. Is anyone liable for copyright violation? If so, who? Is there any case law establishing a precedent for prosecuting the leaker and/or the journalists who broke the story?
Google for "+scientology +copyright".
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code, (continued)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code James Edwards (May 25)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Mister Coffee (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Tobias Weisserth (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Mister Coffee (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Ron DuFresne (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Mister Coffee (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Ron DuFresne (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Mister Coffee (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Ron DuFresne (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code James Edwards (May 25)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Benjamin Krueger (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Valdis . Kletnieks (May 27)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Paolo Mattiangeli (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Jason Weisberger (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Rodrigo Gutierrez (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Mister Coffee (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Cold Fire (May 26)
- RE: Cisco's stolen code Tobias Weisserth (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Valdis . Kletnieks (May 26)