Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Cisco's stolen code
From: madsaxon <madsaxon () direcway com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 13:18:30 -0500
At 10:45 AM 5/25/2004 -0700, Harlan Carvey wrote:
Valdis, I sincerely hope that you do not presume to speak for everyone...
He's not offering an opinion, merely stating a fact: if whitehats are security researchers who don't break the law, then they don't audit code the possession of which is illegal. The only debatable point here is the definition of "whitehat," but that's really just a matter of semantics. This code is the proprietary property of Cisco. Anyone who knowingly examines it or even possesses it without Cisco's permission is in violation of the law in most countries, and therefore not, by definition, acting as a "whitehat." m5x _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco's stolen code, (continued)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Seth Alan Woolley (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Valdis . Kletnieks (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Seth Alan Woolley (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code roman . kunz (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Tobias Weisserth (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Dave Horsfall (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code ktabic (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Azerail (May 27)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Valdis . Kletnieks (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Harlan Carvey (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code madsaxon (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Harlan Carvey (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code VX Dude (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Valdis . Kletnieks (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Valdis . Kletnieks (May 25)