Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Cisco's stolen code
From: Harlan Carvey <keydet89 () yahoo com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 10:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
Valdis, I sincerely hope that you do not presume to speak for everyone... --- Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Tue, 25 May 2004 11:28:19 EDT, Brian Toovey <btoovey () igxglobal com> said:if whitehats dont audit the code, who will? Ifind your response moreignorant.Whitehats won't go anywhere near the Cisco code for the same reason they won't go near the Windows code - even if they feel morally justified in peeking at the source code, it's still illegal to do so. So you need at least a slightly gray hat to even consider the idea - so only grey/black hats will benefit. #include
<open-source-is-better-because-whitehats-can-audit-too.h>
ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco's stolen code, (continued)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Brian Toovey (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Seth Alan Woolley (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Valdis . Kletnieks (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Seth Alan Woolley (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code roman . kunz (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Tobias Weisserth (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Dave Horsfall (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code ktabic (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Azerail (May 27)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Valdis . Kletnieks (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Harlan Carvey (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code madsaxon (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Harlan Carvey (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code VX Dude (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Valdis . Kletnieks (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Valdis . Kletnieks (May 25)