Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: SSL compliant IRCd's?
From: Denis Solaro <dsolaro () freenet de>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 13:10:32 +0200
On Tue, 25 May 2004 12:18:05 +0200 Gadi Evron <ge () egotistical reprehensible net> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Seeing that usual "MS sucks" debate above with no real purpose, I got to thinking..
agreed..
SSL supporting IRC servers have been around for a very long time now. There are a couple of implementations, and a few more private implementations.. some of which use an SSL tunnel on both ends (client and server) in order to get it working.
Well looking at xchat linkage, I've found that... libssl.so.0.9.7 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 (0x405df000) libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 (0x4060d000) And I remember compiling it with ssl support... just to test. so it might be needed in a big scheme somewhere. I just don't know where. Best place to ask then... on IRC itself. :) -- Denis Solaro -- denis.solaro () wanadoo fr _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- SSL compliant IRCd's? Gadi Evron (May 25)
- Re: SSL compliant IRCd's? Denis Solaro (May 25)
- Re: SSL compliant IRCd's? Dave Howe (May 25)
- Re: SSL compliant IRCd's? Thilo Schulz (May 25)
- Re: SSL compliant IRCd's? Jorrit Kronjee (May 25)
- Re: SSL compliant IRCd's? Dave Howe (May 25)
- Re: SSL compliant IRCd's? Denis Solaro (May 25)
- Re: SSL compliant IRCd's? petard (May 25)