Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: [inbox] Re: Re: E-Mail viruses
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 15:03:26 -0500
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:36:10 CST, Curt Purdy said:
Ah, I wish... An alternative is to allow only a proprietary extension through, like .inc Legitimate senders would rename the file, be it .exe .doc .jpg, indicate in the body of the message what the true extension is, and the receiver merely renames it. A little trouble yes, but it virtually eliminates email propagated viruses from the corporation.
So let's see.. the same bozos who read the text part of the virus, get the password, and use that to unzip the rest of the virus won't read the text part, get the rename to do, and..... Color me dubious....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: E-Mail viruses Earl Keyser (Mar 04)
- Re: Re: E-Mail viruses Ron DuFresne (Mar 05)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Re: E-Mail viruses Curt Purdy (Mar 05)
- Re: [inbox] Re: Re: E-Mail viruses Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 05)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Re: E-Mail viruses Curt Purdy (Mar 05)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Re: E-Mail viruses Ron DuFresne (Mar 05)
- Re: Re: E-Mail viruses Cael Abal (Mar 05)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Re: E-Mail viruses Curt Purdy (Mar 05)
- Re: E-Mail viruses Cael Abal (Mar 05)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Re: E-Mail viruses Curt Purdy (Mar 05)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Re: E-Mail viruses Chris DeVoney (Mar 05)
- Re: E-Mail viruses starwars (Mar 05)
- Re: Re: E-Mail viruses Nick FitzGerald (Mar 06)
- Re: Re: E-Mail viruses Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 08)
- Re: Re: E-Mail viruses Nick FitzGerald (Mar 08)
- Re: Re: E-Mail viruses Ron DuFresne (Mar 05)