Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 15:39:27 -0500
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 13:09:04 CST, "Schmehl, Paul L" <pauls () utdallas edu> said:
Wrong. ISP's make money from subscriptions. The ideal subscriber would be someone who pays the $21.95/month (or whatever it is these days) and *never* uses the Internet. If you have 1000's of those, you could make a tidy profit on a T1. The more bandwidth a subscriber uses, the less profitable their subscription is to the ISP.
On the other hand, the people whos business model involves the phrases "peering" and "selling transit" have little incentive to do anything to help a downstream that's spewing spam/viruses/etc. Particularly fun if you managed to come up with an interesting definition of '95 percent'. ;) There's also the issue of pink contracts for spammers, but that's another sordid tale...
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky, (continued)
- RE: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Nick FitzGerald (Mar 03)
- RE: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Larry Seltzer (Mar 04)
- RE: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Nick FitzGerald (Mar 04)
- ProFtp bufferoverflow. Frederic Charpentier (Mar 04)
- Re: ProFtp bufferoverflow. Andreas Gietl (Mar 04)
- RE: ProFtp bufferoverflow. Epic (Mar 04)
- Re: ProFtp bufferoverflow. Andreas Gietl (Mar 04)
- RE: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Nick FitzGerald (Mar 03)
- RE: Critical WFTPD buffer overflow vulnerability Geo. (Mar 04)
- Re: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 04)