Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues
From: Luke Norman <luke () normanonline co uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:33:04 +0100
Whilst I can see your point, when you have an exploit for which there is a widely-published vulnerability publicly available, would it not be easier to simply offer the software to those who want it. I know that if the next time an apache vuln came out, I had to contact someone at apache to get them to give me the update so that I could stop my server being vulnerable, I wouldn't be very happy. If there are publicly available exploits, there should be publicly available patches. Luke Clayton Kossmeyer wrote:
The TAC process for this is to direct customers to their ISP for downloads. The reasons for this are many, but one of the major ones is that SPs/ISPs want to control what versions of software are deployed within their networks.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Jelmer (Mar 29)
- Addressing Cisco Security Issues Geo. (Mar 29)
- Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Jason Dodson (Mar 29)
- Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Micheal Patterson (Mar 29)
- Re: Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Exibar (Mar 29)
- RE: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Burton M. Strauss III (Mar 29)
- Re: RE: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Michael Reilly (Mar 29)
- Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Geoincidents (Mar 29)
- Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Jason Dodson (Mar 29)
- Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Clayton Kossmeyer (Mar 29)
- Re: Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Luke Norman (Mar 29)
- Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Geoincidents (Mar 29)
- RE: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Lou Zirko (Mar 29)
- Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues neal rauhauser (Mar 29)
- Addressing Cisco Security Issues Geo. (Mar 29)
- AW: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Ron Stiemer (Mar 29)
- Message not available
- Re: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Nick FitzGerald (Mar 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Drew Copley (Mar 29)
- Re: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Berend-Jan Wever (Mar 29)
- Re: RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 29)
- RE: [inbox] Re: RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Exibar (Mar 29)
- RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Thor Larholm (Mar 29)