Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Signal to Noise Ratio for February
From: flatline <flatline () greyhat nl>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:44:50 +0100
Gregory,What makes you think F-D's "signal" would consist solely of advisories? If you've read the list charter (http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html), you should know to not only filter on the word "advisory".
Your method of generating a signal:noise relation seems far from correct. / flatline At 11:41 PM 24-03-2004, Gregory A. Gilliss wrote:
List: Just for fun I decided to calculate the S/N ratio of FD. I used the data from February 2004 (the last full month available). Here's my methodology (for those who can do better :-):
[ snip ]
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Signal to Noise Ratio for February Gregory A. Gilliss (Mar 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Signal to Noise Ratio for February flatline (Mar 24)
- RE: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Epic (Mar 24)
- Re: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 25)
- RE: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Epic (Mar 24)
- RE: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Ng, Kenneth (US) (Mar 25)
- Re: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 25)