RE: PIX vs CheckPoint

["Otero, Hernan (EDS)" <HOtero () lanchile cl>]

I think you do, because at least a nat 0 it´s needed to get traffic passing
through the pix.

-H

-----Original Message-----
From: Cyril Guibourg [mailto:plonk-o-matic () teaser fr] 
Sent: Miércoles, 30 de Junio de 2004 4:30
To: Laurent LEVIER
Cc: Darkslaker; full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint

Laurent LEVIER <llevier () argosnet com> writes:

Hi L2,

> At the NAT level, you have to know Pix is a NATing box and everything
> it does is based on NAT.

AFAIK, a PIX can operate without NAT. Did I miss something ?

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html