RE: PIX vs CheckPoint

["James Patterson Wicks" <pwicks () oxygen com>]

That is odd.  When dealing with a Pix firewall, no traffic can go out an interface without some sort of translation 
statement.

Even the default configuration has this:

     nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

There must be either a static or dynamic translation statement in your configuration.


-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of Cyril 
Guibourg
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 2:18 PM
To: Otero, Hernan (EDS)
Cc: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint

"Otero, Hernan         (EDS)" <HOtero () lanchile cl> writes:

> I think you do, because at least a nat 0 it´s needed to get traffic passing
> through the pix.

This is odd, I do have a running config under 6.2 without any nat statement.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html



This e-mail is the property of Oxygen Media, LLC.  It is intended only for the person or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. 
Distribution or copying of this e-mail or the information contained herein by anyone other than the intended recipient 
is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by sending an e-mail to 
postmaster () oxygen com and destroy all electronic and paper copies of this e-mail.


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html