Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: FW: Question for DNS pros
From: Frank Knobbe <frank () knobbe us>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:51:12 -0500
On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 13:57, Paul Schmehl wrote:
For the last time, I have *already* done this. With both a snaplen of 1024 and a snaplen of 4096. It *hasn't* produced anything useful unless someone thinks *this* is useful (I'm using tcpdump on FreeBSD 4.9 RELEASE.): tcpdump -c 100 -xX -s 4069 -i xl0 -p -w x.x.dump 'udp && host x.x.x.x && port 53' (Our IP has been changed to x.x.x.x)
Paul, could you please post some *payload* of these packets instead of just the tcpdump one-liner? Perhaps that's why we confused about your tcpdump output/usage. Thanks, Frank
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- Re: Question for DNS pros, (continued)
- Re: Question for DNS pros Cyril Guibourg (Jul 23)
- Re: Question for DNS pros Nick FitzGerald (Jul 24)
- Re: Question for DNS pros Dave Yingling (Jul 25)
- Re: Question for DNS pros Steffen Schumacher (Jul 25)
- Re: Question for DNS pros Roberto Navarro (Jul 23)
- Re: Question for DNS pros Nils Ketelsen (Jul 25)
- FW: Question for DNS pros Suzi and Harold VanPatten (Jul 25)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Paul Schmehl (Jul 24)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Paul Rolland (Jul 25)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Paul Schmehl (Jul 25)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Frank Knobbe (Jul 25)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Paul Schmehl (Jul 25)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Paul Rolland (Jul 26)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Paul Schmehl (Jul 26)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Paul Rolland (Jul 27)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Paul Schmehl (Jul 24)