Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Status


From: "Gregh" <chows () ozemail com au>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:20:27 +1100


----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick FitzGerald" <nick () virus-l demon co uk>
To: <full-disclosure () lists netsys com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Status


"Gregh" <chows () ozemail com au> wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernardo Quintero" <bernardo () hispasec com>
To: <full-disclosure () lists netsys com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Status


Scan results
 File: message.scr
 Date: 20040127003029
----
Antigen 7.50.1138/20040127 found nothing
InoculateIT 45.00/20040126 found nothing
Kaspersky 3.0/20040126 found nothing
McAfee 4.2.60/20040126 found nothing


Use Mcafee here and it DID find it. Engine 4.3.20 dat 4319

Guys -- we don't care.


It is actually important whether you care or not. The person saying Mcafee
didnt find it for them may have a problem on the machine on which it was
tested or possibly even an ancient Mcafee.

Realistically you will not have access to "the latest" updates so when

That just doesnt make sense said like that. The Mcafee update covering all
this came out before I actually received my first infected email,
interestingly from this list!

some or other product detected something in your potted tests is just
so much noise.


No, It is still good information.

Save list messages for _useful and informative_ content.

There's always the "N" or "DEL" key for messages you don't find useful.

Greg.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: