Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:16:43 -0500
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 01:35:19 +0100, Tobias Weisserth <tobias () weisserth de> said:
Personally I don't think this leak will unavoidably lead to a serious increase of heavy and even more sneakier exploits. We already have them. The last week has been evidence enough. Maybe this will even lead to more security as customers with the capacity will have the potential to identify possible threats themselves and point them out to MS ;-)
"When source is outlawed, only outlaws will have source". Unfortunately, that's essentially the position we're in now...
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"?, (continued)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? ypwhich (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? madsaxon (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Sebastian Dietz (Feb 13)
- RE: Re: W2K source "leaked"? Otero, Hernan (EDS) (Feb 13)
- RE: RE: W2K source "leaked"? John . Airey (Feb 13)
- RE: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Nick Jacobsen (Feb 13)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? SMORRIS (Feb 13)
- RE: W2K source "leaked"? Drew Copley (Feb 13)
- RE: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Schmehl, Paul L (Feb 13)
- RE: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Tobias Weisserth (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 13)
- RE: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Paul Schmehl (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 13)
- RE: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Tobias Weisserth (Feb 13)
- RE: Re: W2K source "leaked"? Drew Copley (Feb 13)
- RE: Re: W2K source "leaked"? Nick FitzGerald (Feb 14)
- RE: W2K source "leaked"? Joe Quigley (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Ake Nordin (Feb 13)
- RE: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Drew Copley (Feb 13)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? somenym81 (Feb 16)