Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: W2K source "leaked"?
From: sil <jesus () resurrected us>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:42:01 -0500 (EST)
This is the CNET article going up. http://news.com.com/2100-7349_3-5158496.html Again, I don't know/care if this is true of MS' source code being posted, and I too smell something fishy in the air with this whole 'story' coming out. Considering there is supposedly 600mb's or so of alleged code, but unless MS says something, I wouldn't know what to think of it. On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Gadi Evron wrote:
Can anyone confirm this is the real source code? How about a press release? :) Gadi Evron
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "The most tyrannical of governments are those which make crimes of opinions, for everyone has an inalienable right to his thoughts." -- Benedict Spinoza //sil http://www.kungfunix.net http://www.politrix.org http://www.infiltrated.net http://bush.shafted.us _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: W2K source "leaked"?, (continued)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? Gregory A. Gilliss (Feb 12)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? Chris McCulloh (Feb 12)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? Byron Copeland (Feb 12)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? Christopher Blume (Feb 12)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? cameronmcansh (Feb 12)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? Isaac Privett (Feb 12)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? Byron Copeland (Feb 12)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? Gregory A. Gilliss (Feb 12)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? cameronmcansh (Feb 12)
- Re: Re: W2K source "leaked"? Mike Roetto (Feb 13)
- Re: Re: W2K source "leaked"? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 13)
- RE: W2K source "leaked"? Paul O'Malley (Feb 13)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? Gadi Evron (Feb 13)
- Partial protection against MyDoom Tomasz Grabowski (Feb 12)