Re: W2K source "leaked"?

[cameronmcansh () iprimus com au]

Friday, 27 October, 2000, 16:23 GMT 17:23 UK

Probably not :)

> -- Original Message --
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] W2K source "leaked"?
> From: Byron Copeland <nodialtone () comcast net>
> To: "Gregory A. Gilliss" <ggilliss () netpublishing com>
> Cc: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
> Date: 12 Feb 2004 20:16:03 -0500
>
>
> As an avid FULL DISCLOSURE reader, where is this "some of" source code?
>
> On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 18:55, Gregory A. Gilliss wrote:
> > Does this count as confirmation?
> >
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/993933.stm
> >
> > G
> >
> > On or about 2004.02.12 23:48:52 +0000, Gadi Evron (ge () egotistical reprehensible net)
> said:
> > > A couple of days ago a friend of mine drew my attention to the source
>
> > > making rounds on the encrypted p2p networks, I was hoping it would take
>
> > > a bit longer for it to be "out", but that was just day-dreaming.
> > >
> > > Thor Larholm just gave me this URL, as you can notice, the server is
> busy:
> > > http://www.neowin.net/comments.php?id=17509
> > <<SNIP>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html