Re: W2K source "leaked"?

["Lee" <cheekypeople () sec33 com>]

ok let get some reality here and quit on the sensationalism here....

All universities and selected folk have copies of the source, so it was
bound to find a way out shortly, the leaked copy is 660mb in size, the full
source for MS win2k is over 40GIG so we have 1/100 of the code, so some piss
ant student working on it, decided to plug in his usb drive and copy it
across to impress his mates on IRC...

Big dam wow.......
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brad Griffin" <b.griffin () cqu edu au>
To: <full-disclosure () lists netsys com>
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 6:02 AM
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] W2K source "leaked"?


> Hey all
>
> I find these 'visions of doom' quite funny when stated on this list.
> Wasn't full-disclosure started around the time MS, SF (or is that
> Symantec) and others started secret squirrelling about exploits and
> source code etc?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Byron Copeland [mailto:nodialtone () comcast net]
> > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 2:44 PM
> > To: Isaac Privett
> > Cc: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
> > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] W2K source "leaked"?
> >
> > Well, in instances like this, however unfortunate, I think
> > this probably is only the beginning of mangled code we'll be
> > seeing. Anyone else have visions of mayhem as well?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html