Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: (no subject)
From: "Alerta Redsegura" <alerta () redsegura com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:08:57 -0500
A quick Googling on Diabetes Type I and Diabetes Type II shows they are indeed different, and their difference is very clear. (See http://www.lef.org/protocols/prtcl-042.shtml for example) As common mortals, most of us don't have a clue about that (and don't need to, unless we are somehow exposed to diabetes or interested in it). But honestly, I can't imagine a medical doctor not knowing the difference... The same is true for computer viruses, people don't care and shouldn't care about virus naming: what they need is timely protection. But it's way different when it comes to the AV industry and all the ones who are somewhat involved in this matter. Cheers, IƱigo Koch Red Segura ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kyle Maxwell" <krmaxwell () gmail com> To: <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu> Cc: "Frank Knobbe" <frank () knobbe us>; <full-disclosure () netsys com> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 1:00 PM Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] (no subject)
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:44:57 -0400, valdis.kletnieks () vt edu <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:33:50 CDT, Frank Knobbe said:I know, my wife has type 2. They still call it diabetes.By that logic, we have "bagle", "agobot", "netsky", and "mydoom". No need for variant names, and no need for a name for an attack of
pancreatic
cancer that knocks out your insulin production, because that's just
diabetes too.
But that's the point: first of all there's Beagle/Bagle/Alu, not to mention the variants that *do* exist. Type I and II diabetes (and yes, my wife too) mean the same thing to any doctor -- whereas different folks have different variant names for the same thing. It would be more akin to some doctors reversing Type I and Type II or even adding Type III or IV without any standardization with anyone else. That said, it's clear that the answers for antivirus/malware and medicine cannot be the same due to the speed of response needed, as you and others point out. Some type of standardization would be great but it can't slow down response times. -- Kyle Maxwell krmaxwell () gmail com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: (no subject), (continued)
- Re: (no subject) Todd Burroughs (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Nick FitzGerald (Aug 10)
- RE: AV Naming Convention Todd Towles (Aug 10)
- RE: AV Naming Convention Nick FitzGerald (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Frank Knobbe (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Frank Knobbe (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Kyle Maxwell (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Alerta Redsegura (Aug 10)
- RE: (no subject) Todd Towles (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) (!!!) Thomas Loch (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) (!!! (complement)) Thomas Loch (Aug 10)
- RE: (no subject) Todd Towles (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Nick FitzGerald (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Maarten (Aug 12)
- Re: (no subject) Michael Simpson (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Paul Schmehl (Aug 10)
- RE: (no subject) spoofed addresses still confuse many... Ron DuFresne (Aug 09)