Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: AV Naming Convention
From: "Todd Towles" <toddtowles () brookshires com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:15:42 -0500
I have to agree with Todd, the naming convention is now right useless for the normal population and make keeping up with viruses on a corporate level that much harder. AV companies are always trying to beat the other company and this leads to very little information sharing between the companies on new viruses, etc. Maybe a foundation should be created. This foundation could give a seal of approval to all AV corporations that join in. We are starting to make rules for patch management over at patchmanagment.org. Why couldn't a group work with AV names and the first company that finds and IDs it correctly gets to name it in the foundation. Just a dream, I would guess. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: (no subject), (continued)
- Re: (no subject) Nick FitzGerald (Aug 13)
- Re: (no subject) Maarten (Aug 13)
- Re: (no subject) Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 13)
- Re: (no subject) Maarten (Aug 13)
- Re: (no subject) Nick FitzGerald (Aug 14)
- Re: (no subject) Al Reust (Aug 15)
- Re: (no subject) Maarten (Aug 15)
- Re: (no subject) Michel Messerschmidt (Aug 16)
- Re: (no subject) Todd Burroughs (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Nick FitzGerald (Aug 10)
- RE: AV Naming Convention Todd Towles (Aug 10)
- RE: AV Naming Convention Nick FitzGerald (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Frank Knobbe (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Frank Knobbe (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Kyle Maxwell (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Alerta Redsegura (Aug 10)
- RE: (no subject) Todd Towles (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) (!!!) Thomas Loch (Aug 10)