Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Training & Certifications


From: "Exibar" <exibar () thelair com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 13:39:30 -0400

Interesting, if memory serves me (it does every now and again), before this
policy went into effect, they had a listing of all CISSPs right on their web
site.  Now, when they started that, I dunno, so even that could have been
after you're inquiry to them.

  it just wouldn't make any sense to have a certification process, and not
be able to verify if a potential job candidate is actually certified.  Talk
about being certified only on paper, print out your own certificate, instant
certification!  Kinda like those online diplomas :-)

  Ex


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Laura Taylor" <ltaylor () relevanttechnologies com>
To: "'Exibar'" <exibar () thelair com>; "'Ron DuFresne'"
<dufresne () winternet com>; <full-disclosure () lists netsys com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 8:07 AM
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Training & Certifications


It sounds like this policy went into effect 10/1/03 from the looks of the
posting. This is definitely new and was not on their site when I made my
inquiry which was in 2002. The person was not mistaken as I called twice
to
be sure...it is a new policy that they are not verifying...and a good
thing.
It's nice to see. Thanks for pointing that out. Laura

-----Original Message-----
From: Exibar [mailto:exibar () thelair com]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 4:46 PM
To: Ron DuFresne; full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Training & Certifications


The person that Laura spoke to was mistaken,  right from their website it
states:

In the interim, (ISC)2 Services, 2494 Bayshore Boulevard, Suite 201,
Dunedin, FL 34698 USA, PH: 1.888.333.4458, FX: 1.727.738.8522, will
continue
to respond to any employer requests for (ISC)2 credential holder
verifications. Such requests must be in writing on the employer's company
letterhead and a release signature from the CISSP/SSCP must be included in
the request.

That's found here: https://www.isc2.org/cgi/directory.cgi

  Exibar


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron DuFresne" <dufresne () winternet com>
To: "Dave Howe" <DaveHowe () cmn sharp-uk co uk>
Cc: "Email List: Full Disclosure" <full-disclosure () lists netsys com>;
"Laura
Taylor" <ltaylor () relevanttechnologies com>
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Training & Certifications



[orig snipped]

This was recently posted to the firewall wizards list, and relates to
this
topic;

From: Laura Taylor <ltaylor () relevanttechnologies com>
Subject: RE: [fw-wiz] Seeking input: Research Proposal: "Is a third
position
    possible?"
Cc: firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:30:33 -0500
To: 'Crispin Cowan' <crispin () crispincowan com>,
     "'Holt, Philip'" <holtp () seattleu edu>

Something curious to know about CISSP is this....

I was thinking of hiring a person with a CISSP and called up ISC2 to
verify
if they really were a CISSP. ISC2 told me that they never verify if
anyone
is a CISSP as it is an invasion of the person's privacy. I then asked
them
how could I know for sure if this person really was a CISSP and told
them
that the person was not listed in the CISSP database on the ISC2 web
site.
They then told me that not all CISSPs are listed in the database because
some don't want to be listed. They told me that the only way to verifiy
if
a person is a CISSP is to ask them for their certificate. I then asked
them if all certificates look exactly alike and can they tell me how to
know if a certificate it authenticate. I was told that all certificates
do
not look exactly alike and that they have changed their look over the
years so there is no way to know if a particular certificate is real or
not.

After much discussion, it became clear that they were not willing to
verify if anyone is a CISSP, and that there was no way for anyone to
really verify this information unless the person chooses to be listed in
the database on the ISC2 web site. I told them that in my opinion their
process for certification was not consistent with the concept of "trust,
but verify" and I ended up not hiring the person I had originally
interviewed.

If a certification cannot be verified, to me it is worthless. I'd rather
hire an MCSE because Microsoft is willing to verify all their
certifications.

The philosophies and ethics of 2600 could possibly be questionable, but
I
dare say that ISC2 is not at all the organization that I once thought it
to be.

Laura




Thanks,

Ron DuFresne
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity.  It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***

OK, so you're a Ph.D.  Just don't touch anything.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html






_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: