Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: RPC scanners


From: Matthew Wagenknecht <Matthew.Wagenknecht () Quantum com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 11:23:49 -0600

It always shows the correct number for me.. 3 class-c's shows up as 762..etc

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Matt Wagenknecht, CISSP
Security Administrator
 ::::        echo oraios i syzygos kai polloi paidia          ::::
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 
Never be afraid to try something new. 
Remember, amateurs built the ark; professionals built the Titanic. 


This email may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole
use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
the sender and delete all copies of this email message.



-----Original Message-----
From: Brown, Randy (InfoSec) [mailto:randy.brown () hp com] 
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 10:15 AM
To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] RPC scanners


I can add a few cents...  I like the Foundstone tool.  Their tools are
usually very easy for the end-user.  This one does take a lot of time to run
though...  And not matter how many sub-nets I scan, the total number is
always 65xxx.  Something just doesn't "feel" right...

         Randy
What can Brown do for you?  (tm)

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: