Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: RPC scanners
From: Matthew Wagenknecht <Matthew.Wagenknecht () Quantum com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 11:23:49 -0600
It always shows the correct number for me.. 3 class-c's shows up as 762..etc -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Matt Wagenknecht, CISSP Security Administrator :::: echo oraios i syzygos kai polloi paidia :::: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Never be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the ark; professionals built the Titanic. This email may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email message. -----Original Message----- From: Brown, Randy (InfoSec) [mailto:randy.brown () hp com] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 10:15 AM To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] RPC scanners I can add a few cents... I like the Foundstone tool. Their tools are usually very easy for the end-user. This one does take a lot of time to run though... And not matter how many sub-nets I scan, the total number is always 65xxx. Something just doesn't "feel" right... Randy What can Brown do for you? (tm) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RPC scanners Schmehl, Paul L (Sep 12)
- RE: RPC scanners deji (Sep 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: RPC scanners Brown, Randy (InfoSec) (Sep 12)
- RE: RPC scanners Matthew Wagenknecht (Sep 12)
- RE: RPC scanners Schmehl, Paul L (Sep 12)