Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws
From: "Schmehl, Paul L" <pauls () utdallas edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 13:26:11 -0500
-----Original Message----- From: Jerry Heidtke [mailto:jheidtke () fmlh edu] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 10:33 AM To: Schmehl, Paul L; full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws No one is going to manually touch 2000+ machines (unless you're a consultant and you get paid by the hour). That's why there're tools to check whether the file properties are correct for a particular hot fix. For example, Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer (free),
Sorry, don't trust it and don't like it.
GFI Languard Network Security Scanner (inexpensive),
Using it.
Shavlik HFNetcheckPro (expensive),
Not using it.
and Microsoft SMS (with SU feature pack) (very expensive)
Using both it and SUS.
will all do file version and/or checksum calculations to verify that a particular file is what should be there to consider a patch to be installed. Some of these will even automatically deploy the patches to machines that are missing them.
All of which I am already aware of, and much of which we are already using. If you read my post about this, then you already know that I'm using ISS, Retina and Languard as well as the MS KB824146 scanner to check for patch compliance. So I'm not quite sure what you point is. Gary suggested checking file properties and I *assumed* he meant for every machine. He has now clarified that he meant machines that are questionable. Now, as to whether or not I'm negligent as a professional...well...opinions are like other things that humans have - each one is unique. :-) Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws Schmehl, Paul L (Sep 26)
- Re: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws Gary Flynn (Sep 26)
- RE: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws Jay Sulzberger (Sep 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws Schmehl, Paul L (Sep 26)
- RE: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws Jerry Heidtke (Sep 26)
- RE: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws Schmehl, Paul L (Sep 26)
- RE: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws Schmehl, Paul L (Sep 26)
- RE: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws Schmehl, Paul L (Sep 26)
- Re: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windows Cael Abal (Sep 26)
- Re: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windows Paul Schmehl (Sep 26)
- Re: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windows Karl DeBisschop (Sep 27)
- Re: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windows Brent J. Nordquist (Sep 29)
- Re: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windows Cael Abal (Sep 26)
- RE: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws Jay Sulzberger (Sep 26)