Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Local DoS in windows.


From: bipin gautam <visitbipin () yahoo com>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 09:12:00 -0700 (PDT)


see guy's i wasn't wrong! NA, NONE OF THEM ARE USING
THE HACKED VERSION OF SHELL32.DLL ANYWAY!

i've tried it  in fresh installed windows xp.
well, as npguy says...
the bug worked in his 128 ram PC!

but surprisingly i have 256mb p3, and it worked there
too...

[ i can't still understand... what the heck causes
this real problem ]
--------------------------------------------
--- Joe <mvp () joeware net> wrote:
Umm nope, not on my XP SP1 machine. I have about 15
windows running and avg
1% utilization. I do your little trick and there is
no change. 

Though maybe it is because my machine is one of
those really fast 900Mhz
PIII's. 

Maybe the problem is you are running a hacked
version of shell32.dll from
http://www.geocities.com/visitbipin/ and he screwed
it up. 

Thanks for playing.

   joe


-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On
Behalf Of bipin gautam
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 1:18 PM
To: Full-Disclosure () lists netsys com
Cc: bugtraq () securityfocus com

--- [Affected] ---
We have only tried it in windows Xp.

--- [Bug Details] ---
http://www.geocities.com/visitbipin/win_dos.jpg
The image is self explanatory...

--- [Description] ---
When you click to "any" close, maximize or minimize
button's in windows Xp,
[No matter whether it's IE or a WordPad]
surprisingly there is 100% CPU use
at the instant and it continues............ until
you release the button!
Moreover, we've noticed if you continuously click
the button for a long time
[... not release it and hold ON ] we've seen
gradual/slow rise in page-file
use too...!!!

--- [Conclusion] ---
Hell... local DoS! That could be used by employees
working at different
terminal..... (O;

--- [Background Information] ---
This bug was originally discovered by
hUNT3R,[myself] a member of 01
Security Submission. The vendor was notified via
email.
http://www.ysgnet.com/hn
--- [I want a JOB/scholarship... anyone??? - hUNT3R]
---

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product
search
http://shopping.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


-------------------------------------------------------
--- npguy <npguy () ysgnet com> wrote:
shamefully it happen with my xp running in 128 mb
ram pc whereas another 
which has enough ram, has not shown this problem.

On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:05:29 -0400,
<Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 02:18:16 +0200, Richard Spiers
<dksaarth () unix za net> 
said:
whoopee!. Bleh. Really a security issue? Same
thing happens if you have 
show
windows content enabled and you drag around a
window, as long as your
dragging the window, the cpu will remain close to
100 % usage. 
Significant?

Probably not directly, but possibly indirectly.

The questions are, of course:

1) Is the 100% cycle sucking done as a
pre-emptible thing, or can you
cpu-starve something else using it?

2) Is there some *other* security-related API that
botches incorrectly if 
it's
cpu-starved?

No, unless its proof of some shoddy coding of
some-sort.

A hammer is a useful tool for finding 
non-impact-resistant screws......




-- 
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:
http://www.opera.com/m2/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: