Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Spam with PGP


From: Security Administrator <security () saharu com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 09:21:39 -0400 (EDT)


 I remember hearing this is another method for bypassing spam filters.
Apparently some filters will pass e-mail with PGP signatures thinking it
is legitimate. It is an interesting concept, though.

 I think my favorite is still the jpgin an html enabled e-mail with
seemingly valid information and links that is actually a link to an xss or
pr0n site. Spammers are starting to use better methodologies and soon
filtering options will be almost impossible. I find it amusing to see what
they will do next, though.

-William

#########################
  security () saharu com
   I'm nobody, yet..
#########################

On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Lan Guy wrote:

I just got this piece of Spam, with a PGP signature!
Lan Guy
----- Original Message -----
From: <mhz2H4 () comcast com>
To: "sackMail" <>
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 12:30 PM
Subject: l, i didnt know you could put that up there , h l t


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 Hash: Q5

 The following is your information.  This info will make you a happier
 person. If it does not make you a happier person maybe you need
 to get out more.


What was that thing she put up inside;

  http://200.206.184.201:8040/11/cgi/spind.pl?h=fi.dat&p=1a&lah=sq3ycn



2_._._._7

1) Switch your email options;
3)  http://200.206.184.201:8040/11/r2.html



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (GNU/Linux)

owsejfoiewur9834u9u3j4ojdflsejflkiew934udfo3i
sfdpo32i09rediwoejdolwesdnlfklksdjfj3409jldsfdk
sdnok3peodkpo3kdpo3kdnlaskdnlsakdnlwkd0-9
sfdpo32i09redswoejdolwesdnlfklksdjfj3409jlddfdk
sdlnkfsdk.fv,fe
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: