Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re[2]: W2k users, local admin rights and GPOs
From: 3APA3A <3APA3A () SECURITY NNOV RU>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 00:11:47 +0300
Dear Sergey V. Gordeychik, There are more ways to stop GPs from applying. For example see http://www.security.nnov.ru/search/news.asp?binid=1613 --Wednesday, October 29, 2003, 5:48:01 PM, you wrote to security () exim dyndns org: SVG> So, I got an idea. SVG> Everybody, who can drop pings, or SMB commutations, from his local SVG> machine to DC can prevent GPO updates! SVG> User can use IPSec policy (sic!) to do it :-) SVG> So, Laura right :-) SVG> And I'm wrong :-( SVG> _______________________________________________ SVG> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. SVG> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html -- ~/ZARAZA Ну а в целом, Уильям, здешний климат - ежели только это можно назвать климатом, вполне сносный. (Твен) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- W2k users, local admin rights and GPOs James Exim (Oct 29)
- Re: W2k users, local admin rights and GPOs Exibar (Oct 29)
- Re: W2k users, local admin rights and GPOs yossarian (Oct 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: W2k users, local admin rights and GPOs Sergey V. Gordeychik (Oct 29)
- RE: W2k users, local admin rights and GPOs Sergey V. Gordeychik (Oct 29)
- Re[2]: W2k users, local admin rights and GPOs 3APA3A (Oct 30)
- RE: W2k users, local admin rights and GPOs Sergey V. Gordeychik (Oct 30)
- Re: W2k users, local admin rights and GPOs Exibar (Oct 29)