Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Off topic programming thread
From: madsaxon <madsaxon () direcway com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 10:44:57 -0600
At 09:36 AM 10/27/03 -0600, Schmehl, Paul L wrote:
> Can we move this irrelevant programming thread somewhere > where it is on-topic? It may be interesting, but it belongs > on comp.programming or something. I might be willing to > join in, but it doesn't belong here on FD. > I have seen irrelevant stuff on this list. I fail to see how a discussion of buffer overflows and race conditions in code is off topic. I suspect that many people, including myself, would benefit from a better understanding of how and why they occur, and what needs to be done to fix the problem.
Agreed. I find this discussion to be one of the more on-topic I've seen here. Let's not discourage it, shall we? m5x _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Off topic programming thread Schmehl, Paul L (Oct 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Off topic programming thread madsaxon (Oct 27)
- Re: Off topic programming thread Bill Royds (Oct 27)
- Re: Off topic programming thread Brett Hutley (Oct 28)
- Re: Off topic programming thread Bill Royds (Oct 29)
- Re: Off topic programming thread Alexandre Dulaunoy (Oct 29)
- Re: Off topic programming thread Brett Hutley (Oct 29)
- Re: Off topic programming thread Bill Royds (Oct 29)
- Auditing code for security problems Bill Royds (Oct 29)
- Re: Off topic programming thread Bill Royds (Oct 27)
- Re: Off topic programming thread Brett Hutley (Oct 29)