Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: RE: Linux (in)security
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:28:31 -0400
Schmehl, Paul L wrote:
Now, lest you get your hopes up and think it's possible to change the world, read this: http://www.ukauthority.com/articles/story898.asp
Ok, I read that as "we asked them to enter their password, and 15% of them typed something in response". I don't see where it says they verified that this was indeed the person's password.
I'd have typed something in there too; probably "your password".
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: [inbox] Re: Linux (in)security, (continued)
- Re: [inbox] Re: Linux (in)security Chris Ruvolo (Oct 24)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 24)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Henning Brauer (Oct 30)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security Ron DuFresne (Oct 23)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security Peter Busser (Oct 23)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security Ron DuFresne (Oct 23)
- Linux Exec Shield (was: Linux (in)security) Chris Ruvolo (Oct 23)
- Re: Linux Exec Shield (was: Linux (in)security) Peter Busser (Oct 23)
- Re: Linux Exec Shield (was: Linux (in)security) Arjan van de Ven (Oct 23)
- Re: Linux Exec Shield (was: Linux (in)security) Chris Ruvolo (Oct 24)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security I.R. van Dongen (Oct 22)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security Robert Brockway (Oct 22)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security madsaxon (Oct 23)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security Ron DuFresne (Oct 23)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security Paul Schmehl (Oct 23)