Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Re: No Subject


From: Peter Busser <peter () adamantix org>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:14:42 +0200

On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 08:41:59PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Wednesday, October 22, 2003 1:20 AM +0200 Michal Zalewski 
<lcamtuf () ghettot org> wrote:

Rant: mainstream Linux is generally not all that enthusiastic about
implementing security features (even non-executable stack or using some
feeble but standard kernel security capabilities is quite unpopular in
major distributions). Adding transcluent buttons to KDE/GNOME seems to be
the top priority.

Am I the only one on the list who immediately thought of Microsoft when 
reading this rant?
:-)

The big difference here is that you _can_ choose for a distribution that
provides more security if you want. You just have to search a bit and you can
find about a dozen security related Linux and *BSD projects/products.

Groetjes,
Peter Busser
-- 
The Adamantix Project
Taking trustworthy software out of the labs, and into the real world
http://www.adamantix.org/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: