Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning


From: Jeremiah Cornelius <jeremiah () nur net>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 11:26:48 -0800

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Just look at the "latest" sendmail available for Solaris 8.

Far worse than the complaints about Debian stable.

So, don't complain about Fedora.  You don't like it - fix it Mr. Know-it-all.  
It's GPL and /community/ based.  You want to use it? You want it to suit your 
needs?  /Participate/ in the community!  You don't like the updater?  You 
might contribute RPMS for apt-get or the Mandrake updater - ported to the 
Fedora back-end. Maybe a secure transport for Kickstart - with the rpmfind 
db?  

The sky is the limit - - if you don't wait for other people to take you there, 
and /complian/ that they aren't!

Jeremiah Cornelius

On Tuesday 04 November 2003 08:22, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 10:25:55 EST, Eric Bowser said:


Fedora seems like it will be unstable/difficult to patch/*insert
whatever here* in an intentional effort to extract money from users for
the enterprise version.  I don't debate the business sense behind their
decisions, but they have made a viable OS available for years, gotten
everybody addicted, and then replaced it with your choice of headaches,
or a pay-to-play product.  Don't drug dealers do that?


On the other hand, commercial OS's tend to be *really* static, without
much innovation - look at IBM's z/OS, there's still remnants in there
from OS/360 in 1964.  People complain that Solaris hasn't picked up
<whatever> that other vendors have been doing for years.

That's the price of stability.

You should be glad that RedHat is willing to finance a distro where
the Next Big Thing can develop, even if it isn't their official product.
It's quite possibly the best thing that could have happened to
*both* RedHat and Fedora lines - now there's no longer the big
stability/innovation conflict that having one product line trying
to do both had.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/p/2BJi2cv3XsiSARAnoIAKDJPfwlMO5mzRU9a3vYfbnNr4ZZggCffV82
UW4e0cYFUfuOnzxmWqLxNaE=
=Y/oP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: