Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning
From: Jeremiah Cornelius <jeremiah () nur net>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 11:26:48 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just look at the "latest" sendmail available for Solaris 8. Far worse than the complaints about Debian stable. So, don't complain about Fedora. You don't like it - fix it Mr. Know-it-all. It's GPL and /community/ based. You want to use it? You want it to suit your needs? /Participate/ in the community! You don't like the updater? You might contribute RPMS for apt-get or the Mandrake updater - ported to the Fedora back-end. Maybe a secure transport for Kickstart - with the rpmfind db? The sky is the limit - - if you don't wait for other people to take you there, and /complian/ that they aren't! Jeremiah Cornelius On Tuesday 04 November 2003 08:22, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 10:25:55 EST, Eric Bowser said:Fedora seems like it will be unstable/difficult to patch/*insert whatever here* in an intentional effort to extract money from users for the enterprise version. I don't debate the business sense behind their decisions, but they have made a viable OS available for years, gotten everybody addicted, and then replaced it with your choice of headaches, or a pay-to-play product. Don't drug dealers do that?On the other hand, commercial OS's tend to be *really* static, without much innovation - look at IBM's z/OS, there's still remnants in there from OS/360 in 1964. People complain that Solaris hasn't picked up <whatever> that other vendors have been doing for years. That's the price of stability. You should be glad that RedHat is willing to finance a distro where the Next Big Thing can develop, even if it isn't their official product. It's quite possibly the best thing that could have happened to *both* RedHat and Fedora lines - now there's no longer the big stability/innovation conflict that having one product line trying to do both had.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/p/2BJi2cv3XsiSARAnoIAKDJPfwlMO5mzRU9a3vYfbnNr4ZZggCffV82 UW4e0cYFUfuOnzxmWqLxNaE= =Y/oP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning, (continued)
- Re: Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Nov 03)
- Re: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Cael Abal (Nov 04)
- Re: Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning petard (Nov 04)
- Re: Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Nov 04)
- Re: Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Steffen Kluge (Nov 04)
- Re: Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Joshua Levitsky (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Eric Bowser (Nov 04)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 04)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Jeremiah Cornelius (Nov 04)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Ron DuFresne (Nov 04)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 04)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Jeremiah Cornelius (Nov 04)