Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Fw: A question for the list...
From: "morning_wood" <se_cur_ity () hotmail com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 16:34:27 -0700
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Carp" <erc () pobox com> To: "morning_wood" <se_cur_ity () hotmail com>; <nick () virus-l demon co uk>; "Full-Disclosure@Lists. Netsys. Com" <full-disclosure () lists netsys com> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 3:26 PM Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Fw: A question for the list...
as to any "privcy", it is my mail, and I will damn will do with it as I please. If any one else would like their personal mails posted,Actually, depending on where you live, you may be very wrong. In most places, email (like everything else) is the property of the original
author
(who holds the copyright). Just because you are sent an email message doesn't confer any sort of special rights - just because you download a
web
page that is publicly accessible, does that give you the right to do with
it
as you please? Of course not. In short, it is *not* "your" email, it is the sender's email, and if he wants to sue your silly twit ass for distributing it without his
permission,
he is perfectly free to do so - in at least a dozen countries that I can think of, this *is* the law. Better check the law before shooting your mouth off about things which you might not be fully informed.
Dear Mr Ed Crap, Mail is private until read, just because its labled as "mail" does not imply land based mail laws in whatever country you are in apply. If the internet at large had coined the term "imsg" or something else then it wouldnt be "mail" now would it.? You assume my email address is connected some how to a "private" account? It may be set up to autocollect my mail and post it to a webpage for public consumption, much like the full disclosure list here. To further note, I dont recall making acusations, or sending mail of a threatning, demeaning and sexualy explit maner to anyone on this list personally. It was "mrs jimi's" choice to send that to what she assumed was a personal address. Basicly its like this... as long as you so called "professionals" keep bitching about dumbass stuff, and being very incorrect 99% of the time, mabey the public will see the advantage to using "greyhats" to test and secure their websites and networks, as all you can do is quote from your professors and you self-help motivational seminars. It makes me sick how you bullshitted your way into a 60,000$ a year job and you can even think up a 0day if your life depended on it, let alone stop your secretary from running kazza etc. I challenge you to go through my posts and find an instance where a so called "security professional" accused me of some action or incorectness of information / action and I did'nt prove them wrong, not only by fact and theory, but by example. Have a great day MrCrap Donnie Werner http://exploitlabs.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Fw: A question for the list..., (continued)
- Re: Fw: A question for the list... morning_wood (May 25)
- Re: Fw: A question for the list... Nick Jacobsen (May 25)
- Re: Fw: A question for the list... morning_wood (May 25)
- RE: Fw: A question for the list... Mads Tansø (May 25)
- Re: Fw: A question for the list... KF (May 25)
- Re: Fw: A question for the list... xlopkov (May 26)
- Re: Fw: A question for the list... Ron DuFresne (May 27)
- Re: Fw: A question for the list... morning_wood (May 26)
- RE: Fw: A question for the list... Ed Carp (May 26)
- Re: Fw: A question for the list... morning_wood (May 26)
- Re: Fw: A question for the list... Cedric Blancher (May 26)
- Re: Fw: A question for the list... Nick Jacobsen (May 27)
- RE : Fw: A question for the list... Ulysse (May 27)
- Re: Fw: A question for the list... morning_wood (May 27)
- RE: Fw: A question for the list... random nut (May 27)