Full Disclosure mailing list archives
AW: Zone Alarm
From: "Michael Linke" <ml () intract org>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 22:37:50 +0200
There is one big benefit, which no hardware router can bring you. Zone alarm and other Windows based Software Firewalls can block network access for programs. A HW firewall can only block a whole machine but can't denied access for one software and allow access for another software on the same machine. intract - any business anywhere Michael Linke Netzwerkadministrator Heilbronnerstr. 50 D-73728 Esslingen Germany Phone : +49 384 16297 50 Fax : +49 711 35152 89 mobile : +49 178 51 52 959 e-mail : ml () intract org ICQ : 141033973 webside: http://www.intract.org
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com [mailto:full-disclosure- admin () lists netsys com] Im Auftrag von Jason Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. Juni 2003 20:53 An: morning_wood Cc: Ben Tyson-Norrman; full-disclosure () lists netsys com Unfortunately the $40 'hardware' devices are not either. Please reference the excellent work by Core http://www1.corest.com/common/showdoc.php?idx=276&idxseccion=10 and the _much_ more expensive 'hardware' devices are just as prone http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/pix-multiple-vuln-pub.shtml http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/pixfirewall-authen-flood-pub.shtml http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/PIXfirewallSMTPfilter-regression- pub.shtml ... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/advisory.html For a personal solution Zone Alarm is quite possibly more adequate and appropriate. morning_wood wrote:Zone Alarmbuy a $40 hardware router. Software firewalls are not asecurity solution IMHO.morning_wood ----- Original Message ----- From: Ben Tyson-Norrman To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:53 AM Subject: [Full-disclosure] Zone Alarm I'm not sure I can ask this question without derision, but here goes... Zone Alarm, is it really as crap as everyone makes out.... or is theusual posturing by ill-informed...?Many thanks all Visit our web site @ www.twowaytv.com This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above namedrecipient(s) only and may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. If you are not a named addressee or have received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately at postmaster () twowaytv co uk and then delete this e-mail. As Internet communications are not secure we do not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or responsibility for any change made to this message after the original sender sent it. Save for this legal notice, the contents or opinions contained within this e-mail are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Two Way TV Ltd unless otherwise specifically stated._______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Zone Alarm Ben Tyson-Norrman (Jun 04)
- Re: Zone Alarm morning_wood (Jun 04)
- RE: Zone Alarm Joe Hummel (Jun 04)
- RE: Zone Alarm Larry W. Cashdollar (Jun 04)
- RE: Zone Alarm Ron DuFresne (Jun 05)
- Re: Zone Alarm Jason (Jun 04)
- AW: Zone Alarm Michael Linke (Jun 04)
- AW: Zone Alarm Michael Osten (Jun 04)
- Re: AW: Zone Alarm Jason (Jun 04)
- Re: AW: Zone Alarm Michael Osten (Jun 04)
- YABBT [1] - Re: Zone Alarm Jason (Jun 04)
- Re: YABBT [1] - Re: Zone Alarm Michael Osten (Jun 04)
- Re: YABBT [1] - Re: Zone Alarm Ron DuFresne (Jun 05)
- Re: YABBT [1] - Re: Zone Alarm Jason (Jun 05)
- RE: Zone Alarm Joe Hummel (Jun 04)
- Re: Zone Alarm morning_wood (Jun 04)
- Re: AW: Zone Alarm morning_wood (Jun 04)
- Re: AW: Zone Alarm Shawn McMahon (Jun 05)
- Re: AW: Zone Alarm morning_wood (Jun 05)