Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: mnogosearch 3.1.20 and 3.2.10 buffer overflow
From: John Cartwright <johnc () grok org uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:22:11 +0100
FYI: pokleyzz <pokleyzz_at_scan-associates.net> has kindly confirmed that the vendor was contacted on the 1st of June ... I'd urge contributors to avoid ambiguous date formats in their posts where possible due to confusion with US/UK/other conventions. Cheers - John _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- mnogosearch 3.1.20 and 3.2.10 buffer overflow pokleyzz (Jun 10)
- Re: mnogosearch 3.1.20 and 3.2.10 buffer overflow morning_wood (Jun 10)
- Re: mnogosearch 3.1.20 and 3.2.10 buffer overflow John Cartwright (Jun 10)
- Re: mnogosearch 3.1.20 and 3.2.10 buffer overflow Larry W. Cashdollar (Jun 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: mnogosearch 3.1.20 and 3.2.10 buffer overflow Steven M. Christey (Jun 10)
- (offtopic) datestamp formats and timezones Justin (Jun 10)
- Re: mnogosearch 3.1.20 and 3.2.10 buffer overflow morning_wood (Jun 10)