Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: mnogosearch 3.1.20 and 3.2.10 buffer overflow
From: "morning_wood" <se_cur_ity () hotmail com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 01:42:22 -0700
----- Original Message ----- From: "pokleyzz" <pokleyzz () scan-associates net> To: <full-disclosure () lists netsys com> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 6:52 PM Subject: [Full-disclosure] mnogosearch 3.1.20 and 3.2.10 buffer overflow
-------------- snippy -------------
Vendor Response =============== Vendor has been contacted on 01/06/2003 and fix is available from cvs at http://www.mnogosearch.org.
------------ end snippy ----------- 5 months... This is full disclosure? "there was a hole, now its fixed" why even bother posting.. kinda sounds like a idefense tactic.. FULL DISCLOSURE means just that dosent it? I dont get it? morning_wood http://nothackers.org Only Full Public Disclosure Reseachers Please the general public is invited to contribute openly, and freely to 0day () nothackers org lurkers may enjoy the archives - _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- mnogosearch 3.1.20 and 3.2.10 buffer overflow pokleyzz (Jun 10)
- Re: mnogosearch 3.1.20 and 3.2.10 buffer overflow morning_wood (Jun 10)
- Re: mnogosearch 3.1.20 and 3.2.10 buffer overflow John Cartwright (Jun 10)
- Re: mnogosearch 3.1.20 and 3.2.10 buffer overflow Larry W. Cashdollar (Jun 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: mnogosearch 3.1.20 and 3.2.10 buffer overflow Steven M. Christey (Jun 10)
- (offtopic) datestamp formats and timezones Justin (Jun 10)
- Re: mnogosearch 3.1.20 and 3.2.10 buffer overflow morning_wood (Jun 10)