Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm
From: "morning_wood" <se_cur_ity () hotmail com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 20:35:05 -0700
I'd rather have an inexperienced user behind a PFW any day than expect them to understand and *properly* implement NAT *and* a firewall. I'd rather have them introduced to the concept of security in a way that they understand than to shove it down their throats with technology they don't comprehend and can't possibly use correctly.
Todays personal style routers require nothing more than the physical connections and dhcp ( default by most out of the box OS'es ) and nearly forget about, the only education is to explain that thier ip is not 192.168.blabla.bla.. theres no need to " expect them to understand and *properly* implement NAT *and* a firewall" .I still stand by a 40$ personal router utilizing NAT. Theres nowhere for the packets to go.. and please, when was the last time anyone here had to flash a personal style router / switch within the past 2 years... dont go esoteric on us now.. moreNINwood _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm Schmehl, Paul L (Jun 04)
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm morning_wood (Jun 04)
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm Shawn McMahon (Jun 05)
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm morning_wood (Jun 05)
- RE: [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm JT (Jun 05)
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm morning_wood (Jun 05)
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm Shawn McMahon (Jun 05)
- RE: [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm JT (Jun 05)
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm Shawn McMahon (Jun 05)
- RE: [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm JT (Jun 05)
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm Shawn McMahon (Jun 05)
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm Nick FitzGerald (Jun 05)
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm morning_wood (Jun 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm Robert J. Liebsch (Jun 04)