Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters)


From: "Danny Miller" <Danny.Miller () cbeyond net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 15:39:22 -0400

So, customer demand, security and most-effective-software-to-do-the-job
aside...I wonder what kind of deal Microsoft cut with the Government?  I
wonder who, if anyone, got bumped out?

Anyone else catch the story on /. Yesterday about the Munich deal?

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/07/15/1854215

Danny

-----Original Message-----
From: northern snowfall [mailto:dbailey27 () ameritech net] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:50 PM
To: Brad Bemis
Cc: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid (
Reuters)



You are absolutely right!  I will not argue this point at all.  The
only
thing I will say is that product security is based on a process of
evolution.  My statement was intended to indicate that it is customer
demand that drives the speed of that evolution.  

No. Customer demand should play the *least* part in security evolution.
The *main* thing that security analysts and security developers should
focus on are the capabilities of the opposition, whomever they may be.
Your foe is not your customer, and if he is he will not lead you toward
pleasant waters. Again, your thinking is dangerous.

Don

http://www.7f.no-ip.com/~north_



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: