Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters)
From: "Brad Bemis" <Brad.Bemis () airborne com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:21:52 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I find it interesting that so many negative comments have been made about this. Throwing off the biases against Microsoft for past code-based transgressions and the historical promulgation of insecure software, it is not like Microsoft hasn't made a significant effort to revamp the security of its more modern systems. While they still have a long way to go over the next 5 to 10 years, they have made several commitments to the realization of their proposed trustworthy computing initiatives. I am by no means arguing that Microsoft systems are secure, but I would like to point out that Windows 2000 and XP offer a myriad of security enhancements that, given a COMPETENT installation by a KNOWLEDGEABLE system administrator following DOCUMENTED practices for device hardening, Microsoft products can actually provide a great deal of security (so long as you can implement an effective patch management solution on top of your host hardening procedures). This progressive migration toward a more secure operating platform is further evidenced by the "secure by design, secure by default" shift in security philosophies centered around the release of Windows 2003 Server. My point is that security is a process, not a product. Microsoft is going to work very hard with the DHS to provide a secure baseline that takes into account the sensitivity of information associated with the defense of critical infrastructure assets. Comments stating that Microsoft will be incapable of providing an appropriate service (or at least a service comparable to any competitor in the marketplace) are biased and without merit. Of course, this is probably the worst forum possible to make a statement of this nature and I am sure I will be flamed repeatedly. Thank you for your time and attention, ======================== Brad Bemis ======================== -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQA/AwUBPxV7oJDnOfS48mrdEQJaYgCfU1TjrhwMxK20EVCqUoogEwc4qJ0AoOuZ n/cZY6ZFy+MmTaP4C8Qtt/6n =S/qm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) Brad Bemis (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) northern snowfall (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 16)
- RE: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) Jason Coombs (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) yossarian (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) northern snowfall (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) Blue Boar (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) northern snowfall (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) Ross Dmochowski (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) yossarian (Jul 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) Jonathan Grotegut (Jul 16)