Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again )
From: Linc B <listbot () mailandnews com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 05:09:21 -0400
On 14 Jul 2003 12:22:52 +0100, Mark Lowes wrote:
One of the problems is that there a non-trivial number of these people aren't capable of properly securing a machine. Anything a vendor does to try and improve the default baseline the better, as long as they don't block the option for those who wish to redo the box in their own style / to fit their own local security needs then more power to them and I hope it's enough of a success that other vendors follow.
The reason vendors didn't do it in past years is that microsoft required them to ship windows in its "pristine" condition. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ), (continued)
- Re: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) Peter Busser (Jul 04)
- Re: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) morning_wood (Jul 04)
- Re: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) Nick FitzGerald (Jul 04)
- Re: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) Ron DuFresne (Jul 12)
- RE: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) Scott (Jul 13)
- RE: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) Ron DuFresne (Jul 13)
- RE: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) Scott (Jul 13)
- Re: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) Roy S. Rapoport (Jul 14)
- Re: Microsoft Cries Wolf ( again ) Mark Lowes (Jul 14)