Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c)
From: "CHeeKY" <cheekypeople () sec33 com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 21:13:31 +0100
Microsoft aint a security company, never said they was, they are a business company that supplies a mass marketed product that people can use. Do you want to sue the Washing Powder companies because it doesnt get all your stains clean? Busines is Business, if we dont like, then make ya own operating system, or learn to enhance the ones that are available, instead os simply knocking whats alreayd there, but not doing much about it, normal case is people cant do anything so they knock stuff instead. I personally like Micorosft and theor products, amny of enhanced my systems and business and I also like nix* as it has ehnaced and progressed my business, both in different ways. Personally my business couldnt run without MS, not becuae of cost of change to competitor, just that some of my business needs are best suited by their products. I have an in house security tean, which I actively head (when not running my own show) as a Checkpoint Instructor, and a solid methodical approach, with skills in hardening and understanding systems, and how the business should face the internet have helped myself and my company grow. I dont know, I help, as exploits do help this, I understand C+ as I taught myself as well as the security department, its about piecing togther valuble resoureces, like anything in life. If I have my personal way I would turn the internet off, or create a private one so my business could thrive even more. Instead for now I harness and embrace what I have and think how it has helped, not knocking shit because of this and that, I see MS and Nix* to be so different yet so many people compare... Hmm... Sorry if I ranted, just perspective thats all. Regards ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FIGHT BACK AGAINST SPAM! Download Spam Inspector, the Award Winning Anti-Spam Filter http://mail.giantcompany.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "David R. Piegdon" <fleshyCPU () gmx net> To: <full-disclosure () lists netsys com> Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 8:25 PM Subject: Re: Re: [Full-disclosure] DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 IMHO it is TIME to sue corporations like microsoft for their stupidity - and their believe that people/customers are even more stupid. they sell their software and tell about their "great security-concepts", but they actually do nothing about it. in opposite, open-source-software is given away for free and WITHOUT any warranty, so they should be on the save side. i do not think that sueing a corporation for only one bug is ok, but if it is (very) repetitive (and it is in M$-software), it is not only
acceptable but
neccessary. david r piegdon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/JCcYWCFHEwXrEHMRAgKNAJ45RN6Z+ch2mbo9sE3iMqgleT/0SACeMYz8 Dse3LlqGV2FPx+E6ZQNKCjw= =r05M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit, (continued)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit w g (Jul 26)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Neeko Oni (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Neeko Oni (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) CHeeKY (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) tcpdumb (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) El Guille (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) tcpdumb (Jul 27)
- Re: Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Jennifer Bradley (Jul 27)
- Re: Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Jennifer Bradley (Jul 27)
- Re: Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) David R. Piegdon (Jul 27)
- Re: Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) CHeeKY (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Justin Shin (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) tcpdumb (Jul 27)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Nick FitzGerald (Jul 27)
- Re: Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) David R. Piegdon (Jul 27)
- Re: Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Dan Stromberg (Jul 28)
- Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c) Curt Purdy (Jul 31)