Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq
From: "O.C.Rochford" <orochford () inet-sec org>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:46:12 +0000
hello that is quite frankly a lot of bollocks. fact is that you can't research everything yourself, the amount of information is just too great, all this does is remove a place where peoples own research can be speeded up without having to reinvent the wheel, as well as sharing the findings of research. If you are saying you can audit the code of a whole OS yourself, than you must be a code god, and all of these people who bitch about "sciptkiddies" and the like just stealing other people's research should only say so if they have never made use of these sources themselves. You have to start somewhere to learn, and you have to be able to pool resources to share the load in auditing the amount of code and programs available today. regards O.C.Rochford Saturday, January 11, 2003, 10:00:08 PM, you wrote: r> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- r> [Full-Disclosure] Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq
(snip) They went out of their way to intentionally remove a feature from the public database. It's not like they've decided it's too much work to keep maintaining or something, they've got paying customers for the commercial version. I can only imagine that this was a policy decision because Symantec didn't want to be seen as hosting the exploits they are trying to protect their customers against. Same reason they don't make malicious code samples available to the public.
r> Corporate ass-covering and profiteering at its worst. No great shock r> there. r> Not that any of this matters, in the long run: the only people this is r> going to impact in the slightest are script kiddies (the standard r> variety, as well as hidebound ""professionals"" firmly attached to the r> corporate teat) too stupid or lazy to research the information r> themselves. The community will adapt, one way or another. Those left r> behind will have only themselves to blame. r> I say anything which speeds up the Darwinian course of events can only r> be a good thing. Let's hear it for natural selection. r> Ratel. r> *** r> "Americans used to roar like lions for liberty. Now we bleat r> like sheep for security." - Norman Vincent Peale. r> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- r> Version: MailVault 2.2 from Laissez Faire City http://www.mailvault.com r> iQA/AwUAPiCT0uYNtyh3zif9EQJSRwCfSrfi9LtzXPMa9mHKxso+BtGVMF4AoJDe r> qq50xusT9pgg4K4OKm/ucoUK r> =A4oR r> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Best regards, O.C.Rochford mailto:orochford () inet-sec org _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq, (continued)
- Re: Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq Blue Boar (Jan 10)
- Re: Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq Dave Aitel (Jan 10)
- Re: Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq Axel (Jan 09)
- Re: Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq David M. Wilson (Jan 09)
- Message not available
- Re: Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq David M. Wilson (Jan 10)
- Re: Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq Ka (Jan 10)
- Re: Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq Ken Dyke (Jan 10)
- Re: Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq Ka (Jan 11)
- Re: Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq Ken Dyke (Jan 12)
- Re: Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq O.C.Rochford (Jan 12)
- Re: Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq hellNbak (Jan 12)
- Re: Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq Nicob (Jan 12)
- Re: Fwd: fuck symantec & boycott bugtraq hellNbak (Jan 12)