Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:37:16 -0400
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 11:39:26 CDT, Matthew Murphy <mattmurphy () kc rr com> said:
distribution is a *needed* channel. Of course, if WU gets taken down by the floods, we're back at square one, as WU remains the primary distribution mechanism for patches to home users.
Nobody gave a shit when windowsupdate.microsoft.com got nailed with CodeRed.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: [normal] RE: Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS, (continued)
- Re: [normal] RE: Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS martin f krafft (Aug 12)
- RE: Re: [normal] RE: Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS Marc Maiffret (Aug 12)
- Re: [normal] RE: Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS James Greenhalgh (Aug 12)
- Re: [normal] RE: Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS morning_wood (Aug 12)
- RE: Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS Andrew Thomas (Aug 12)
- Re: Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS Franky Van Liedekerke (Aug 12)
- Re: Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS Jeremiah Cornelius (Aug 12)
- RE: Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS Nick FitzGerald (Aug 12)
- Re: Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 13)
- Re: Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS Max Valdez (Aug 15)
- Re: Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 16)
- Re: Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS martin f krafft (Aug 12)
- Re: Re: Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS Sebastian Niehaus (Aug 13)
- Windows Dcom Worm Killer w g (Aug 13)
- Re: Windows Dcom Worm Killer Joey (Aug 13)