Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS


From: Franky Van Liedekerke <liedekef () pandora be>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:40:05 +0200

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:14:56 +0200
"Andrew Thomas" <andrew () generator co za> wrote:

From: Nick FitzGerald
Sent: 12 August 2003 01:48
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS


"Andrew Thomas" <andrewt () nmh co za> wrote:

The examinations of the code so far indicate that the worm is
coded to DoS the windowsupdate site from the 15th of August 
onwards through the end of the year.

I'll ignore the sloppiness in that description, as several of the 
published descriptions have (or at least initially got) it confused 
through slightly wrong too...

The examinations of the code *that I have read so far* indicate 
that...?

And, of course, if MS started messing with the DNS entries for 
windowsupdate.com, it would be cutting an awful lot of users off from

much needed updates. which could be as disturbing as the rest of the 
worm's effects...

Still leaving large organisations and smaller ISP's free to make
the decision themselves on whether the loss of Windows update
is more or less important than the prevention of the additional
spurious traffic.

In countries/situations where bandwidth is paid for by traffic 
transferred, and is often quite expensive, I suspect that more 
decisions will be made to eliminate access to WindowsUpdate, 
at least for a period of time, rather than paying for excess
traffic generated. 

It's more than a matter of degraded service.

I guess everybody can implement SUSserver (www.susserver.com): it's a
local version of a windows update server.
If you implement this, you can allow only this server access to the
microsoft update sites, and let everybody else (from within the
ISP his network) connect to the local update server.
Then everybody still has access to the updates, while no excess traffix
to the internet is made.
Of course if you don't want your server to be DOS'sed ...

Franky
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: