Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source
From: Person <devon () lithiumnode com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 15:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Top-posters kind of suck too ;) [d]
(Personally, I have never cared about binaries nor pictures being sent as long as their size were small... It is just html email which I hate.) Just some food for thought from a contrary viewpoint.-----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of S . f . Stover Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:06 AM To: Len Rose Cc: Raj Mathur; full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source On 18 Aug 03 03:40:34PM Len Rose[len () netsys com] wrote: : My message was not about the size ofd : the file but rather about the sheer useless re-transmission : of a binary (any executable) that no one in their right mind : would actually run which is why I suggested that source code : should be included next time. Would that really matter though? I mean, how would I know that the binary included came from the attached source? Plus, I do have quarantined machines I blow away and rebuild regularly that I don't mind putting unknown binaries on from time to time. Any my mileage definitely does vary ;-) Just my 0.02. I figure there's no list like FD for unknown binaries... -- attica () stackheap org GPG Key ID: 0xF8F859D0 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xF8F859D0&op=index"There is no such thing as right and wrong, there's just popular opinion." -Jeffrey Goines _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Len Rose (Aug 18)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Raj Mathur (Aug 18)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Len Rose (Aug 18)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source S . f . Stover (Aug 18)
- RE: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Drew Copley (Aug 18)
- RE: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Person (Aug 18)
- RE: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Drew Copley (Aug 18)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Andreas Gietl (Aug 18)
- RE: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Drew Copley (Aug 18)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Andreas Gietl (Aug 19)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Len Rose (Aug 18)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Raj Mathur (Aug 18)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Anthony Saffer (Aug 18)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Stephen Clowater (Aug 19)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fwd: Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Stephen Clowater (Aug 18)
- Re: Fwd: Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Jim Race (Aug 18)